Category: history

  • New York Times: Leonia Park Still Disputed

    New York Times: Leonia Park Still Disputed

    Special to the New York Times

    Sunday, April 15, 1973

    LEONIA—As the glitter of spring settles in over the craggy woodland of Highwood Hills, it is difficult to believe that it was only 18 months ago that this placid tract had churned up a good deal of political froth and some bitter factional debates in this otherwise sedate community.

    The 14‐acre site— it is mostly borough‐owned — is still, in the words of one local official, “an open wound.”

    This woodland, some say, would carry a price tag of about $4‐million on a realestate auction block. And many residents view the tract not as a sanctuary away from urban stress, but as a high‐potency tax generator that is not being exploted.

    The local spotlight was focused on the site during the 1971 municipal campaign, a political fray that produced one of Bergen County’s most stunning upsets. In unusually heavy off-year balloting, Democrats seized the mayoralty and control of the Borough Council for the first time in the town’s long history of automatic Republican shoo-ins.

    On the same ballor that swept Mayor Tom Ford into power, voters gave the nod, 1,876 to 1,515 to a referendum granting a 10-year lease on the property to the nature center group.

    In addition to the systematic mobilization of proecology forces, a contributing factor in the nature center victory was a public endorsement of the proposal by Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas.

    The ecology group, which had emerged slowly over a 10‐year period, and whose membership now numbers about 200 borough families, had pushed vigorously during the year preceding the election to have the site designated as a permanent park. The lease arrangement was viewed as a compromise solution.

    Nonetheless, says Mayor Ford, his administration is going ahead with its hopes of having the tract dedicated permanently as a nature site. Hopes for receiving a Federal grant from the Department of Housing and Urban Development have been set back as a results of President Nixon’s budget, however there are plans to try to move forward with an application for state “Green Acre” funds, which would enable the borough to purchase smaller, enclave-like plots within the borough tract.

    Mr. Ford said that Green Acre funds were also frozen at this time as a result of the Legislature’s failure to appropriate more than one-fourth of the $40 million that state voters decided to commit to Green Acres in a 1971 referendum. Green Acre funds are granted to municipalities for the purchase of undeveloped tracts, which are then dedicated as parks or natural sites.

    A ‘Loose Agreement’

    “What we have now is nothing more than a rather loose agrement with the nature center’s board of directors,” Mr. Ford observed.

    But the mayor says he is heartened by what he feels is a perceptible switch — even among more conservative segments of the borough electorate — from preoccupations with tax ratables to a broader concern with the quality of life.

    “The issue may be cranked up when the lease comes up for renewal,’ Mr. Ford declared, “but I feel the majority will want to keep the tract as a nature center.”

    The opposition leader is John Wragge, a long ‐ time borough resident who served on a municipal committee that was established to study the site.

    Admitting that “for the moment, it’s no longer an issue,” Mr. Wragge declared that he and many of those who voted against the proposal were still convinced that the decision to “freeze” the property was a mistake.

    Of the seven members who served with him on the study committee, he said, only one favored any kind of leasing or dedication of the site. He and other committee members, Mr. Wragge insists, cautioned strongly against entering into any sort of agreement that would tie up the property and prevent its development into tax ratables.

    Empahsis on Taxes

    Mr. Wragge insists that, until the state’s tax structure is changed, with a shift away from heavy dependence upon local levies, the site must be viewed principally as a tax generator.

    In his view, the tract, with its spectacular views, would lend itself to development either with luxury one-family homes or medium-rise apartment houses.

    Acknowledging that his opposition forces had been caught up in a “sociological-economic” debate at the time of the referendum, Mr. Wragge says that the nature center is not really necessary, since the borough already has adequate park facilites.

    Moreover, he added, Leonia already overextended itself in 1950 by deeding 120 acres to the county for development as part of Overpeck County Park.

    Meanwhile, depsite all the political fireworks still simmering in the community, nature center members are moving forward with an impressive program for the spring and summer. It includes nature walks and talks, an Easter egg hunt, bird watching, nature sketching and sculpture, geology field trips and a jazz concert.

    In addition, the center regularly conducts courses in field biology for elementary and high school students.

    The nature center’s board of trustees, which is in the midst of changing chairmen following the resignation of Joan Luikart—she withdrew to pursue doctoral studies—has hired a part‐time director for the summer.

    He is Tor Hansen, a young artist-naturalist from Englewood, who is active with the nearby Tenafly Nature Center. Mr. Hansen says he is looking forward to helping borough children explore the site and study the many varieties of plant, animal and insect life that abound there.

    Children, he says, seem to be the ones who have the deepest appreciation and feel the deepest exhilaration in the presence of nature. His role, as Mr. Hansen views it, is to help them in the “big battle: the swing back from the megalopolis concept of living.”

  • New York Times: Justice Douglas Supports Plan To Preserve Leonia Woodlands

    New York Times: Justice Douglas Supports Plan To Preserve Leonia Woodlands

    LEONIA, N. J., Oct, 30 —Associate Justice William O. Douglas of the Supreme Court today urged the preservation of a 13‐acre, publicly owned wooded area threatened by residential development.

    At the same time, the Atlantic Chapter of the Sierra Club, the national conservation organization, urged passage of referendum in Tuesday’s election to give the Leonia Nature Center a 10‐year lease on the tract.

    The woodland, just west, of Highway 46 in the southeast corner of Leonia, is known as Highwood Hills. The Leonia Nature Center, a group of 500 residents, is seeking a lease from the town as a precondition for the creation of formal nature trails, camping areas and other facilities for conservation education.

    Opponents of the lease have said that the property could be sold by the borough for $1‐million and that its residential development for town houses would add $2‐million in tax ratables for the community.

    Justice Douglas and his wife hiked through Highwood Hills four years ago. In a letter to the nature center today he recalled that visit and said: “The destiny of that lovely 13‐acre tract is once more in the balance.”

    Both he and his wife, he wrote, “hope it can be saved as a quiet alcove in an area that has already experienced many of the adversities that follow in the wake of a galloping population.”

    The question of granting a lease to the nature center has become a major political issue in this borough of 8,000 people. Democratic candidates for Mayor and two Council seats have strongly urged passage of the referendum, while Republican candidates have indicated misgivings about a lease that would prevent the borough from permitting development of the tract for at least 10 years.

    The borough acquired the land more than 30 years ago, following the construction of approach routes to the George Washington Bridge, which is about half a mile from Highwood Hills.

  • New York Times: Douglases Hike on Jersey Tract

    New York Times: Douglases Hike on Jersey Tract

    Justice and His Wife Back Sanctuary in Leonia

    By Will Lissner Special To the New York Times

    April 1, 1967

    LEONIA, N. J., April 1—Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, accompanied by his wife, led a party of Leonia citizens in a hike today through a 13-acre brier patch here to dramatize his belief that it is urgently needed as a wilderness sanctuary.

    Justice and Mrs. Douglas came to the mile-square community a mile from the George Washington Bridge in response to a letter from Mrs. Walter P. Luikart, chairman of the Leonia Citizens’ Committee to Save Highwood Hills.

    “I have grown up here and watched the small green areas in town disappear,” Mrs. Luikart wrote. “We may not get through to them [the borough government] because they do not feel it is very important. We feel it is very important, though. And your influence could make the difference in their understanding of that!”

    Mayor Allen R. Hill of Leonia, who believes the tract should be developed to bring in taxes so as to keep down the tax rate, said he couldn’t understand why Mr. Douglas should bother about Leonia.

    But Justice Douglas, who has led conservation battles across the country, said the sanctuary was very important.

    ‘Leonia Symbolic’

    “Leonia is symbolic of the thousands of communities where far-sighted citizens are fighting to save their remaining open spaces as a heritage for the generations to come,” he said.

    Justice Douglas wore a white shirt and black business suit. Mrs. Douglas wore a brown suit with a blue turtleneck sweater. Though both wore dress shoes, they plunged without hesitation into the brier patch below the brow of a hill echoing with the traffic of Route 46, overlooking the meadowland swamp created by a tributary of the Hackensack River on the west of the borough.

    The hike, guided by Mrs. Luikart, led first to Lizard Pond. James Wallace of 12 Paulin Boulevard, nearby, who was brought up in the neighborhood, said once the neighbors used to fill pitchers at the spring to get the clear, delightful mineral water.

    “Now it’s polluted and the lizards are gone,” he said.

    Everybody jumped across the stretch of mud where the spring that fed the pond overflowed as it coursed down the hillside. The trail threaded a maze through sumach and bayberry, and trees like birch and cherry. The yellowish green vines of the catbrier, with sharp thorns protruding every three or four inches, stretch like barbed wire, making part of the area impassable.

    Mrs. Luikart, following the trail up and down hill led the group over only part of the tract, although the Douglases wanted to do it all. “We’ve a schedule,” she explained.

    Justice Douglas compared notes along the trail with Col. C. E. Tarvin, a retired Army man who is a naturalist by avocation.

    Thirty-five years ago, the tract’s subsoil was stripped to provide fill for the George Washington Bridge construction. At that point, plant life had to start from scratch on the barren subsoil.

    Progress has been made. But if Highwood Hills were stripped of its brier patch, the two men agreed, it might revert back to sterile soil.